What was gaspee affair

Included in the Declaration of Independence were some grievances that were directly attributable to the Gaspee Affair 2 : "He has combined, with others, to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by out laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation. For depriving us, in may cases, of the benefit of trial by jury; For transporting us beyond the seas to be tried for pretended offenses: ". One can forever argue the point of which Colonial fracas against the British was the earliest.

But as to the first shot, it depends on when you define the 'start' of the Revolution. We're not talking here of formal armed Revolution—we will happily cede that to Lexington and Concord. We're talking instead about the idealogical revolution for independence from Great Britain. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people. So, yes, in the larger scope of things, it was indeed America's 'First Blow for Freedom'.

Gaspee Virtual Archives. What's the Importance of the Gaspee Affair? Most people know quite well the story of the burning of the Gaspee. But have you ever wondered why we know it as the "Gaspee Affair" rather than simply the "Burning of the Gaspee?

Rather, it was the overzealous British reaction to this incident which stirred the furor of American patriotism — in a much broader and more important way. The collective silence was likely a reflection of the actual solidarity of White colonists, but court records also show that the ruling class intimidated anyone attempting to testify, going so far as to post armed guards along roads where witnesses would travel to report to the British.

Eventually, one man came forward: Aaron Briggs. Briggs was only 17 at the time of the Gaspee burning, and may have been set to be freed at the age of In the days following the attack, Briggs escaped on a boat and rowed out to a British ship stationed in the bay. He told the crew that he had been forced to participate in the Gaspee raid and was able to identify the ringleaders. Initially, the British chained him and threw him into the brig, treating him as a runaway.

After realizing his utility to the Gaspee investigation, the British agreed to take his testimony. Enslaved people in the Americas escaping to one European power or another had a long history. The Spanish repeatedly encouraged people enslaved in British America to win their freedom by escaping to Florida or Cuba. The British issued similar proclamations to people enslaved by the Spanish, French, or Dutch, depending on shifting war alliances.

A few years later in , as the war was beginning, Lord Dunmore, the last colonial governor of Virginia, issued a proclamation that any enslaved person in North America who left their master and joined the British and served in the military would be granted their freedom. Thousands of enslaved people would free themselves via crossing into British lines. According to Briggs, on the night of the attack he was rowing on an errand for his master when he encountered a boat led by slave trader Simeon Potter, who forced him to join his men in the attack on the Gaspee.

Briggs recounted intimate details of every part of the raid, and could identify Potter and Brown, whose names he had overheard during the ordeal. His account matched the testimonies of the British crew and Captain Dudingston. The colonists were furious that a man of color was being allowed to testify at all, and claimed he was scamming the British in order to gain his freedom, or that the British were coercing him.

So much echoed broader colonial fears that London was using people of color against White Protestant settlers. In an extraordinary decision, the commission ruled that it did not have sufficient evidence to bring charges against anyone involved in the attack. It was widely known on all sides that Brown, Potter, and others were responsible, yet these men were not even summoned to testify.

The smear campaign against Briggs was so complete that even his thorough testimony did not lead to conviction. The British seemed to understand the futility of the case, and feared pressing the matter further. Even British Navy head Admiral Montagu repeatedly refused to travel to Newport to attend the commission in person, seemingly out of fear of violent reprisal. The raid on the Gaspee and subsequent commission stoked anti-British fervor among elites throughout North America. In the immediate wake, the Virginia House of Burgesses created their Committees of Correspondence to share information between the colonies, and other colonies followed suit.

These Committees were some of the first bodies to solidify the colonies, and an important precursor to the First Continental Congress. Taken in context, then, it seems that the Gaspee attacks were motivated more by a desire to maintain the lucrative business of slavery than any patriotic ideals. Brown led the Gaspee attacks and eagerly advocated for the revolution, but once it began he repeatedly acted to the detriment the rebels in order to secure personal fortune.

More elaborately, early in the war Brown embarked on a trip to the Continental Congress where he secured himself and his friends contracts for the construction of the first Continental Navy.

He then diverted those resources to building and outfitting privateers for his own enrichment and only delivered his promised naval ships when they were rendered useless by the British blockade of Narragansett Bay. Many notable revolutionaries publicly condemned Brown, including his former friend and associate Esek Hopkins, who was serving as head commander of the Continental Navy.

Because of his disloyalty, Brown successfully conspired to have Hopkins fired from his position. After the Browns learned of his enlistment, the family petitioned the state assembly in protest, saying that because Prince was from Massachusetts, he was not eligible to earn his freedom through Rhode Island military service.

The Browns won and Prince was forced back into slavery. After the revolution, the now independent states drafted the Articles of Confederation, which originally containing a federal tax on imports meant to lift the war-torn new country out of heavy debt. Rhode Island was the sole opponent of the tax, as its merchant class, again led by John Brown, refused to allow a federal government to collect tax on the triangle and West Indies trades.

And this, forsooth, they call patriotism. The merchants fully leveraged their political might and killed the federal tax, helping plunge the early United States into a half-decade of economic chaos until the Constitution, which allowed for Federal taxation and monetary policy, was ratified in While most Americans were brought to economic ruin by the war, Brown and his friends ended the conflict with increased wealth.

He continued to finance transatlantic slave ships, even after doing so was illegal under the federal Slave Trade Act, and was the first person to be tried in court under the law.

Joseph Tillinghast refused to directly serve during the Revolutionary War, instead putting his efforts into privateering for personal gain. He enlisted one of the enslaved men he owned to serve in his place in the militia. After the war, he continued to operate his shipping business to the West Indies, and to sell rum and other goods on his Providence wharves.

Simeon Potter also appears to have disappeared during the Revolution itself, and in fact refused to pay taxes to support the fledgling revolutionary government.

After the revolution, he continued running his merchant empire, and worked closely with the DeWolfs in the continued slave trade. He sent multiple letters to James DeWolf helping him negotiate higher prices for enslaved people, and advising him on how to subvert US taxation and the Federal Slave Trade Act. Nathanael Greene—the revolutionary war hero and merchant whose rum was confiscated by the British just before the Gaspee attack—was granted a former Loyalist slave plantation in Georgia.

He lived on and oversaw the plantation until his death. Whitney invented the cotton gin there in , dramatically accelerating the spread of cotton plantations and slavery across the south in order to supply northern textile factories in Rhode Island and elsewhere.

In , scandal rocked the Rhode Island Gaspee Days parade as a Civil War reenactment outfit marched with a Confederate flag through the streets of Warwick. We condemn slavery as a southern sin while fully ignoring our own deep involvement.

One such instance in Rhode Island was the Gaspee Affair. Since the Revolution, Rhode Islanders have commemorated the Gaspee Affair as one of the earliest watersheds of the movement toward American independence. We seek article submissions which re-contextualize the Gaspee Affair within the broader imperial crisis of its era, with a focus on such topics as other acts of colonial resistance to the crown prior to the Boston Tea Party; a better understanding the Gaspee Affair within the development of global capitalism; situating the role of enslaved and indigenous people in forms of colonial resistance in Revolutionary War period; examining the ways in which the Gaspee has been remembered, reconstructed and recast in various moments of American history; and a better understanding of how communication about pre-war acts of resistance helped to form regional identities that carried into the New Republic period.

View all posts by Christopher Moore. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.